This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

The address-policy-wg Archives

Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]

Starting: Tue May 1 15:53:25 CEST 2007
Ending: Thu May 31 16:33:34 CEST 2007
Messages: 252

• Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Ernest Byaruhanga (AfriNIC)
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-03 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Countdown Policy)   MAEMURA Akinori
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Dean Anderson
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Dean Anderson
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Dean Anderson
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Dean Anderson
• [address-policy-wg] RE: [ppml] A registered ULA policy proposal outline   Azinger, Marla
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Fred Baker
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Leo Bicknell
• 5M prefixes in the core [was: Re: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again ]   Leo Bicknell
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Randy Bush
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Randy Bush
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Randy Bush
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Randy Bush
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Randy Bush
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Randy Bush
• [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Randy Bush
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Randy Bush
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Randy Bush
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Randy Bush
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Randy Bush
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Randy Bush
• [address-policy-wg] ULA discussion   Randy Bush
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Brian E Carpenter
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Brian E Carpenter
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Brian E Carpenter
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Brian E Carpenter
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   David Conrad
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Tobias Cremer
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Tobias Cremer
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Tobias Cremer
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Tobias Cremer
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Andy Davidson
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Owen DeLong
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Owen DeLong
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Owen DeLong
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Owen DeLong
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Owen DeLong
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Owen DeLong
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Owen DeLong
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Gert Doering
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Gert Doering
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Gert Doering
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Gert Doering
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Gert Doering
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Gert Doering
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Gert Doering
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Gert Doering
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Gert Doering
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Gert Doering
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Gert Doering
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Gert Doering
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Gert Doering
• Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Gert Doering
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Gert Doering
• [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Lutz Donnerhacke
• [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Lutz Donnerhacke
• [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Lutz Donnerhacke
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Marshall Eubanks
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Vince Fuller
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Garry Glendown
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Johann Gutauer
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Tony Hain
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Tony Hain
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Tony Hain
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Tony Hain
• [address-policy-wg] RE: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Tony Hain
• [address-policy-wg] RE: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Tony Hain
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Tony Hain
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Tony Hain
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Tony Hain
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Tony Hain
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Martin Hannigan
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Per Heldal
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Per Heldal
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Per Heldal
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Per Heldal
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Nick Hilliard
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Nick Hilliard
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Nick Hilliard
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Nick Hilliard
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Nick Hilliard
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Nick Hilliard
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Nick Hilliard
• Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Nick Hilliard
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Jørgen Hovland
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Jørgen Hovland
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Jørgen Hovland
• [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Jørgen Hovland
• [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Jørgen Hovland
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Geoff Huston
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Geoff Huston
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Geoff Huston
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Geoff Huston
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Joel Jaeggli
• Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Mohacsi Janos
• [address-policy-wg] ULA discussion   Roger Jorgensen
• [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Roger Jørgensen
• [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Roger Jørgensen
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Roger Jørgensen
• [address-policy-wg] [ncc-announce] New E-Learning Module: Using PGP and X509 to Protect MNTNER Objects   Rumy Kanis
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Kevin Kargel
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Shane Kerr
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Shane Kerr
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Shane Kerr
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Shane Kerr
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Shane Kerr
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Shane Kerr
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Shane Kerr
• [address-policy-wg] ARIN IPv6 resolution   Shane Kerr
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Shane Kerr
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Shane Kerr
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 PI Assignment Size   Knight, Brian
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 PI Assignment Size   Brian Knight
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 PI Assignment Size   Brian Knight
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Peter Koch
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Sascha Lenz
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Sascha Lenz
• Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Sascha Lenz
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Sascha Lenz
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 PI Assignment Size   Dennis Lundström
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• AW: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Marcus.Gerdon
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Jeroen Massar
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Jeroen Massar
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Jeroen Massar
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Jeroen Massar
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Jeroen Massar
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Jeroen Massar
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Jeroen Massar
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Jeroen Massar
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Jeroen Massar
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Jeroen Massar
• [address-policy-wg] ULA Registry   Jeroen Massar
• [address-policy-wg] ULA discussion   Jeroen Massar
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Thomas Narten
• 5M prefixes in the core [was: Re: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again ]   Thomas Narten
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Scott Nelson
• Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Masataka Ohta
• Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Flor Paredes
• Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Ricardo Patara
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Ray Plzak
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Ray Plzak
• Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Hisham R Rojoa
• Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Hisham R Rojoa
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Heather Schiller
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Jason Schiller
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Jason Schiller
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 New Draft Document Published (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)   Marc van Selm
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Stephen Sprunk
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Stephen Sprunk
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewallsvs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Stephen Sprunk
• [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Stephen Sprunk
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Stephen Sprunk
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Stephen Sprunk
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Sander Steffann
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Sander Steffann
• [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Sander Steffann
• [address-policy-wg] ULA discussion   Sander Steffann
• [address-policy-wg] ULA discussion   Sander Steffann
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Marcus Stoegbauer
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Ondřej Surý
• Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Son Tran
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 New Policy Proposal (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)   Max Tulyev
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Leo Vegoda
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Leo Vegoda
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Leo Vegoda
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Leo Vegoda
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Leo Vegoda
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Leo Vegoda
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Paul Vixie
• [address-policy-wg] Re: 5M prefixes in the core [was: Re: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again ]   Robin Whittle
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Sebastian Wiesinger
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Sebastian Wiesinger
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Sebastian Wiesinger
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Sebastian Wiesinger
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Sebastian Wiesinger
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
• [address-policy-wg] RE: [ppml] Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 PI Assignment Size   Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
• Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
• Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
• [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   David Williamson
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   David Williamson
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   David Williamson
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   David Williamson
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-04 New Policy Proposal (IANA Policy for Allocation of ASN Blocks to RIRs)   Filiz Yilmaz
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   Filiz Yilmaz
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 New Draft Document Published (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)   Filiz Yilmaz
• [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)   Filiz Yilmaz
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Draft Document will be produced (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)   Filiz Yilmaz
• [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)   michael.dillon at bt.com
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   michael.dillon at bt.com
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   michael.dillon at bt.com
• [address-policy-wg] RE: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   michael.dillon at bt.com
• [address-policy-wg] RE: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica(seen on slashdot)   michael.dillon at bt.com
• [address-policy-wg] Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   michael.dillon at bt.com
• [address-policy-wg] RE: [ppml] Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   michael.dillon at bt.com
• [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?   michael.dillon at bt.com
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   michael.dillon at bt.com
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   michael.dillon at bt.com
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again   Paul_Vixie at isc.org
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   bmanning at karoshi.com
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   bmanning at karoshi.com
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   bmanning at karoshi.com
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   bmanning at karoshi.com
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   bmanning at karoshi.com
• [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   bmanning at karoshi.com
• 5M prefixes in the core [was: Re: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again ]   bmanning at karoshi.com
• [address-policy-wg] Thorsten Toenges/EMD/Merck ist außer Haus.   Thorsten.Toenges at merck.de
• Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)   heather skanks
• [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)   william(at)elan.net

Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]

[ List archive ] [ ]