This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Wed May 2 17:03:23 CEST 2007
All, I think the draft this proposal refers to: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-01 Is an early version of what eventually became RFC 4193: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4193 The RFC does not have any centrally assigned addresses. I didn't actually follow the discussion in the IETF about this document, so I don't know why the centrally assigned version was removed. It's not actually clear to me what the policy proposal is. Does it intend for the RIPE NCC to act as a central registry for all local IPv6 addresses? Does it intend for a special membership category be set up for this? -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]