Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10.05.2007 09:50, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> I'm more in favor for a "number of zones" limit.

I disagree here, as the number of zones

a) is again a number - but which one? How can we decide how many zones
you need to serve. And what if someone has x-1 zones? He won't be
eligible for an anycasting assignment, even if he serves e.g. 9999 zones.

b) is generally no criteria for being eligible for an anycasting
assignment in my opinion. If it would be, it would mean "I'm more
important because I have more zones, and thus may do anycast".


Tobias

- --
Tobias Cremer M.A.
IP Admin Engineer

Cable & Wireless Telecommunication Services GmbH
Landsbergerstr. 155     80687 Muenchen  Germany
Tel +49 89 926 99 0 --  FAX +49 89 926 99 180  -- COMNET 7 49 9169

Geschäftsführer Francois Goreux, Richard Pennal
Amtsgericht München HRB 146 617
www.cw.com/de

- -- Every message GnuPG signed --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGQv06hC6y11CNwvcRAhOaAJ4xj225RJp3RsmtaCl88/3CbBblmgCgpR1K
HfAtaCA3aWTgJB4T9UnD3ig=
=OyVX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----