[address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)

Hi,

On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 11:41:10AM +0100, michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:
> If it is a draft then these ULA addresses do not exist. If they do not
> exist, how can an RIR set up a registry for them?
> 
> Or are you suggesting that the RIRs should overthrow the IETF?

We're working on both ends in parallel, given that the PDP process will
usually take quite some time (especially for a global policy).

So this is sort of a "if the IETF should make space available for ULAs,
will you be happy with this policy?" thing.

(And on the other side, the question is "if the RIRs are willing to set
up a central registry, would the IETF make available ULAs?" - so we can't
just wait for the IETF without having some sort of consensus that the
RIR system will do this)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  113403

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279