This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue May 22 17:41:35 CEST 2007
> 4 years from now, there will be an active IPv4 address space market, > whatever about ipv6. bingo! what amazes me is the lack of real work on the problem that a a jillion v6-only sites can not connect to the internet in a useful scalable way. without that, everyone will continue to need ipv4 space for a loooooong time. and it will be sliced and diced, and bought and sold, in smaller and smaller pieces. and nats will be ubiquitous, as if they were not already. this is not a pleasing picture. but it's the likely reality. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]