Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)

Dear Janos,

Please see below a presentation from RIPE 53, in which you can find 
statistics about PI address space assignments

http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-53/presentations/address_space.pdf

May you required more information, do not hesitate to contact us

Regards,
Flor de Maria Paredes Mattos

Registration Services Manager
RIPE NCC


Mohacsi Janos wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2007, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
>
>> Sascha,
>>
>> Sascha Lenz wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> P.S.: Anyone got any recent numbers about the percentage of PI
>>> announcements in the table vs. PA announcements + deaggregates?
>>>
>> that's probably not the fully adequate answer, but I considered the
>> info in the following two slides (page 9 and 10) as very interesting
>> in this context:
>>
>> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-54/presentations/RIPE_NCC_Statistics.pdf 
>>
>>
>> The bottom line is that the # of PI assignments has (considerably)
>> surpassed the number of PA assignments since 2003, and that the load 
>> on the
>> routing table for PI is thus bigger than for PA, although the 
>> *percentage* of
>> PI space as compared to PA is approx. 2%.
>>
>> Or, the other way 'round, we use more than 50% of (additional) 
>> routing table
>> slots for some 2% of address space (PI) and less than 50% for some 
>> 98% of PA.
>
> Are there similar statistics in the other RIR area?  If the picture is 
> similar we have in RIPE region, then we have think over PI address 
> policy....
>
> Only my 2 cents....
>
> Janos Mohacsi
> Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and 
> Projects
> NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
> Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F  4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
>