This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jørgen Hovland
jorgen at hovland.cx
Wed May 30 11:02:05 CEST 2007
Hi Lutz, Which RIR is that? According to RIPEs IPv6 policy, the minimum PA block is /32 so I was kinda wondering. I need a /96. I can even manage with a /112. (Please let's not start a useless discussion of why you think I need it). Cheers, J -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Lutz Donnerhacke Sent: 29. mai 2007 15:22 To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again * Jørgen Hovland wrote: > Q: Is it correct that you can get a /26 IPv4 PA block, but you can't get > a /96 IPv6 PA block? Why is that? It's not correct. /48, /56, /64, and /112 are the most common assigments here.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]