This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Vixie
paul at vix.com
Tue May 15 19:37:32 CEST 2007
> I am prepared to start listening again as soon as the "Gain"-figures in the > CIDR report start to change dramatically: > > --- 11May07 --- > ASnum NetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description > Table 217147 140280 76867 35.4% All ASes i pretty much hate TE routes. companies who build their business plans on TE routes are, as randy bush once called it, just grazing in the commons. but apparently nobody filters on prefix length any more. that surprises me.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]