This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] RE: [ppml] Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Mon May 14 16:14:17 CEST 2007
Just on a technical side-note... michael.dillon at bt.com wrote: [...] > Hopefully, the v6ops list will look at other alternatives such as using > AS numbers to define a block of addresses Are there enough bits to earmark for that, in a regime of 32bit AS numbers? > similar to the way GLOP > defined multicast addressing in RFC 3180 > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3180.txt > > --Michael Dillon Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]