This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Thu May 3 12:41:10 CEST 2007
> This draft (ula-central-01) is already being updated. > > The policy proposes to act as one of the central (consider one of the > draft > options "central but distributed in several entities", take that as one or > several RIRs) registries. If it is a draft then these ULA addresses do not exist. If they do not exist, how can an RIR set up a registry for them? Or are you suggesting that the RIRs should overthrow the IETF? --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]