This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)

Previous message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Next message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ricardo Patara patara at lacnic.net
Thu May 24 22:13:57 CEST 2007

hi

> Are there similar statistics in the other RIR area?  If the picture is 
> similar we have in RIPE region, then we have think over PI address 
> policy....
> 
> Only my 2 cents....
> 
> Janos Mohacsi
> Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects
> NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
> Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F  4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882

this would be the comparison between number of allocations with number of
assignments in our region:

Allocation

1999      11
2000      42
2001      74
2002      70
2003     104
2004     153
2005     157
2006     202

Assignment

1999       0
2000       7
2001       3
2002       2
2003       6
2004       9
2005       6
2006      14

ricardo patara

LACNIC
Registration Service Manager
--

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ address-policy-wg Archives ]