[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 15-mei-2007, at 11:47, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> 
>> On a related issue, I'd be interested to know what the reachability  
>> degradation was like for the last of the 3ffe:: space after 6/6/6?   
>> You didn't happen to do any measurements on it?
> 
> I wanted to keep my 3ffe block in the air as long as possible to see  
> what would happen. Unfortunately, my ISP stopped routing it almost  
> immediately and I was dead in the water... I was surprised to see how  
> fast all of this went down.

As with everything in that order, see either RIS (http://ris.ripe.net)
or of course http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/dfp/6bone/

Both 3ffe::/24 and 3ffe:800::/24 are still being announced by Bill
Manning, the rest died off quite quickly in the week after

Greets,
 Jeroen

--
GRH 6bone list sorted:

2007-05-22  	2 <-- still alive
2007-02-16 	1
2006-12-15 	1
2006-12-14 	1
2006-10-07 	1
2006-09-19 	1
2006-07-29 	1
2006-07-18 	1
2006-07-08 	1
2006-06-30 	1
2006-06-26 	1
2006-06-21 	1
2006-06-19 	1
2006-06-16 	1
2006-06-15 	2
2006-06-13 	2
2006-06-12 	1
2006-06-08 	3
2006-06-07 	11
2006-06-06 	23 <-- 6GONE date

2006-06-05  	1
2006-06-01 	2
2006-05-30 	1
2006-05-29 	1
2006-05-24 	2
2006-05-17 	1
... lot of other stuff...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 311 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20070522/bc230357/attachment.sig>