This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Tue May 29 19:32:27 CEST 2007
On 29-mei-2007, at 19:25, David Williamson wrote: >>> Disadvantages of ULA-C: >> I can't believe you keep pounding on this dead horse. These are >> PRIVATE addresses. Period. > Uh, neither of those reasons undermines the solution others have > proposed: use PI space. That's like saying people can use real money instead of monopoly money. I really don't get this. Did you guys bet a lot of money that there would never be ULA-C or something? If you don't like it, don't use it yourself and filter it, but PLEASE don't whine about it.
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]