[address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)

bmanning at karoshi.com wrote:
>On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 01:30:01PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>> Other than by issuing bogon lists, where the ULA-centra prefixes will be 
>> noted.  You certainly can't stop it or any other type of ipv6 address 
>> from becoming PI.  But you can stop it from being useful PI space, which 
>> is all you need to do.
>>
>> Nick
> 
> 	you, my friend, have an over inflated view of your ability 
> 	to effect "useful" for others.  imho of course.

I make no claim of any such ability :-)

The point is, if a block is carved out and marked specifically as being 
non-routable on the public v6 internet, it will have degraded connectivity 
to some degree or other.

On a related issue, I'd be interested to know what the reachability 
degradation was like for the last of the 3ffe:: space after 6/6/6?  You 
didn't happen to do any measurements on it?

Nick,
psychically effecting usefulness all over the v6 internet