This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian E Carpenter
brc at zurich.ibm.com
Mon May 14 16:40:50 CEST 2007
On 2007-05-14 16:08, Shane Kerr wrote: > Brian, > > On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 01:34:31PM +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> On 2007-05-11 23:32, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: >>> The RIRs don't depend on IETF at all, they can define global >>> policies for things that the IETF failed to complete if that's the >>> case. IANA can be instructed the same by the RIRs (which a global >>> policy) than by the IETF itself with an RFC. >> Not quite. The RIRs have authority delegated to them by IANA, and >> IANA operates under the terms of its MoU and SLA with the IETF. So >> the RIRs' scope is to set and implement policy within their >> delegated authority, which itself has to be within the terms of the >> IANA MoU and SLA. > > The RIRs authority comes from their communities, not from IANA. > That's what "bottom-up" means. We're both right. It works because there is a wide consensus to both listen to the community and respect the mechanisms in place. Brian
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]