This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Tue May 29 18:58:47 CEST 2007
On 29-mei-2007, at 18:40, Owen DeLong wrote: > Advantages of ULA-C (even to those who claim there are some): > Virtually none. I'm sure you don't mind the plane renumbering in flight when it switches from one satellite connection to the next. Myself, I'd like to see the flight systems to have stable addressing regardless of the orientation of the satellite antennas. > Disadvantages of ULA-C: I can't believe you keep pounding on this dead horse. These are PRIVATE addresses. Period.
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]