[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 PI Assignment Size

Dennis,

>From: Dennis Lundström <dennis at gippnet.com>
>To: "Knight, Brian" <Brian.Knight at us.mizuho-sc.com>
>CC: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
>Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 PI Assignment Size
>Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:56:58 +0200
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Well I suggest you contact the RIPE-NCC about this. There might be a  way 
>around this issue
>Without lying thru your teeth on the 2-year application form.


I followed up with RIPE NCC as suggested  They replied that no exceptions 
could be made, nor did they have any other suggestions for obtaining this 
space.

Thanks very much for your suggestion, though.

-Brian


>If you get a green light from a hostmaster. I guess you can refer to  that 
>conversation to your ISP/LIR
>putting in your requests.
>
>However this is most likely NOT the correct procedure for application.
>
>Best regards!
>
>- --Dennis Lundström
>   GippNET AB AS34537
>
>
>
>On 18 maj 2007, at 20.14, Knight, Brian wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I am writing to voice support for proposal 2006-05, which would change
>>assignment criteria for end-users requesting PI addressing for  
>>multihoming.

[remainder deleted]