[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 29-mei-2007, at 18:40, Owen DeLong wrote:
> 
>> Advantages of ULA-C (even to those who claim there are some):
>> 	Virtually none.
> 
> I'm sure you don't mind the plane renumbering in flight when it  
> switches from one satellite connection to the next. Myself, I'd like  
> to see the flight systems to have stable addressing regardless of the  
> orientation of the satellite antennas.

Which is probably an application for ip-mobility agents and not BGP.

Boeing's (now) historical implementation should be looked at as a
generally bad idea and one can only imagine what it would have looked
like if some large fraction of the 20,000 or so commercial aviation
aircraft that would have been good candidates for it had been so equipped.

>> Disadvantages of ULA-C:
> 
> I can't believe you keep pounding on this dead horse. These are  
> PRIVATE addresses. Period.
> _______________________________________________
> This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List
> (PPML at arin.net).
> Manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
>