This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Previous message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hisham R Rojoa
hisham at afrinic.net
Tue May 29 11:43:53 CEST 2007
Mohacsi Janos wrote thus on 05/23/2007 01:59 PM: > > Are there similar statistics in the other RIR area? If the > picture is similar we have in RIPE region, then we have > think over PI address policy.... If this helps, here is some data from the AfriNIC region: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Year '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PI /16 0 0 0 0.09 0.33 0.34 0.18 1.41 1.74 PA /16 1.81 1.13 3.88 5.81 3.70 3.06 7.58 14.36 39.82 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ rgds ernest -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Ricardo Patara Sent: 25 May 2007 00:14 To: Mohacsi Janos Cc: Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet; Sascha Lenz; address-policy-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations) hi > Are there similar statistics in the other RIR area? If the picture is > similar we have in RIPE region, then we have think over PI address > policy.... > > Only my 2 cents.... > > Janos Mohacsi > Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and > Projects NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A > 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882 this would be the comparison between number of allocations with number of assignments in our region: Allocation 1999 11 2000 42 2001 74 2002 70 2003 104 2004 153 2005 157 2006 202 Assignment 1999 0 2000 7 2001 3 2002 2 2003 6 2004 9 2005 6 2006 14 ricardo patara LACNIC Registration Service Manager -- -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.8.0/817 - Release Date: 24/05/2007 16:01
- Previous message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]