This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Tue May 8 12:42:21 CEST 2007
On 8 May 2007, at 12:01pm, Tony Hain wrote: > Randomness could be a natural outcome if the default configuration > for SOHO > routers was to create one and bury the ability to specify it under > some > 'Advanced/Experts-only' option. Do you see a lot of demand for separate internal and external addressing in SOHO networks? -- Leo Vegoda IANA Numbers Liaison
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]