This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vince Fuller
vaf at cisco.com
Fri May 4 20:56:37 CEST 2007
> The general solution of > the probability of a collision after d draws from n possible values > is given by: > > P = 1 - ((n!) / ((n**d)((n-d)!))) > > Given that the value for n is 2.199,023,255,552, then the objective > is to find the lowest value of d for which P is greater than or equal > to 0.5. In this case the value for d is some 1.24 million. > > > http://draft-huston-ipv6-local-use-comments.potaroo.net Are people going to pick random values? I'd expect a more likely outcome to be that they will pick strings that are easy to remember. How many collisions will there be if that is the case? Remember DEADBEEF? --Vince
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]