[address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)

Some have raised the concern (in other lists) that the ID is expired, so I'm
telling that before it comes back here again.

The way the policy proposal is written is to avoid entering into
implementation issues (which as said, I believe should be decided by the
RIRs staff), and thus in principle, if the authors change implementation
aspects, the policy proposal don't need to be modified.

Regards,
Jordi




> De: Geoff Huston <gih at apnic.net>
> Responder a: <address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net>
> Fecha: Thu, 03 May 2007 11:33:37 +1000
> Para: <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>, "address-policy-wg at ripe.net"
> <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
> Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
> 
> At 10:30 AM 3/05/2007, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>> Hi Geoff,
>> 
>> I guess it is important to clarify that the authors of the draft are working
>> on a new version. I've not yet seen it, so I'm not sure if it is addressing
>> already any of your points below.
> 
> 
> I'm getting very confused - If I understand the situation at this
> point in time this is a policy proposal in the RIR process that is
> based on a document that is actually in preparation at this point in time?
> 
> If this is indeed the case then possibly you might wish to consider
> suspending the policy proposal until such time as the document is completed.
> 
> regards,
> 
>      Geoff
> 
> 




**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.