This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Previous message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Wed May 23 12:02:54 CEST 2007
On 23-mei-2007, at 11:47, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-54/presentations/ > RIPE_NCC_Statistics.pdf > The bottom line is that the # of PI assignments has (considerably) > surpassed the number of PA assignments since 2003, and that the > load on the > routing table for PI is thus bigger than for PA, although the > *percentage* of > PI space as compared to PA is approx. 2%. (As a percentage of the address space, not a percentage of the number of blocks.) > Or, the other way 'round, we use more than 50% of (additional) > routing table > slots for some 2% of address space (PI) and less than 50% for some > 98% of PA. And that's with IPv4, where you have to show you really need a block of 256 addresses to qualify for a PI block. In IPv6, that hurdle has been removed so it has the potential to see even larger numbers of PI as soon as IPv6 deployment starts taking off.
- Previous message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]