Archive: [email protected]/2003

All Archives / anti-spam-wg / 2003 / Author | Chronological | Subject | Thread

• 01 December 2003
  • Re: [[email protected]] SpamAssassin and this list Markus Stumpf
  • Re: [[email protected]] SpamAssassin and this list Emma Bretherick
• 30 November 2003
  • [[email protected]] Hello World Anthony Mellor
• 26 November 2003
  • RE: [anti-spam] [[email protected]] SpamAssassin and this list Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
• 25 November 2003
  • Re: [[email protected]] SpamAssassin and this list Markus Stumpf
  • [[email protected]] SpamAssassin and this list Rodney Tillotson
  • Re: [[email protected]] DNSBL services Mally Mclane
  • Re: [[email protected]] DNSBL services Sabri Berisha
  • [[email protected]] DNSBL services Paul Argentoff
• 06 November 2003
  • Re: [[email protected]] Broken AV software Markus Stumpf
  • Re: [[email protected]] Broken AV software Martin Neitzel
  • Re: [[email protected]] Swedish proposion on 2002/58/EG - B2B spam allowed Anthony Edwards
  • [[email protected]] Broken AV software Patrik Wallstrom
  • Re: [[email protected]] Swedish proposion on 2002/58/EG - B2B spam allowed Piet Beertema
• 06 November 2003
  • [[email protected]] Swedish proposion on 2002/58/EG - B2B spam allowed Claes T
• 04 November 2003
  • Re: [[email protected]] Re: TeliaSonera to block 'zombiepcs' amar
  • Re: [[email protected]] Re: TeliaSonera to block 'zombie pcs' Piet Beertema
  • Re: [[email protected]] Re: TeliaSonera to block 'zombie pcs' amar
  • Re: [[email protected]] Re: TeliaSonera to block 'zombie pcs' amar
  • Re: [[email protected]] Re: TeliaSonera to block 'zombie pcs' Mally Mclane
  • [[email protected]] Re: TeliaSonera to block 'zombie pcs' Rodney Tillotson
  • [[email protected]] TeliaSonera to block 'zombie pcs' Mally Mclane
• 27 October 2003
  • Re: [[email protected]] feasibility of antispam actions Markus Stumpf
• 24 October 2003
  • Re: [[email protected]] feasibility of antispam actions der Mouse
  • Re: [[email protected]] feasibility of antispam actions Markus Stumpf
  • Re: [[email protected]] feasibility of antispam actions der Mouse
  • [[email protected]] feasibility of antispam actions Markus Stumpf
• 13 October 2003
  • Re: [[email protected]] Re: Domain spoofing Clive D.W. Feather
• 10 October 2003
  • Re: [[email protected]] Re: Domain spoofing Markus Stumpf
  • Re: [[email protected]] Re: Domain spoofing Martin Neitzel
  • Re: [[email protected]] RE: [anti-spam] Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [[email protected]] I wrote aspam filter in Perl Clive D.W. Feather
  • Re: [[email protected]] RE: [anti-spam] Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [[email protected]]I wrote aspam filter in Perl der Mouse
  • [[email protected]] RE: [anti-spam] Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [[email protected]]I wrote aspam filter in Perl Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
  • Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [[email protected]] I wrote a spamfilter in Perl Bruce Campbell
• 09 October 2003
  • Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [[email protected]] I wrote a spamfilter in Perl der Mouse
  • Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Domain spoofing - was Re:[[email protected]] I wrote a spam filter in Perl wayne
  • [[email protected]] new RR type Meng Weng Wong
  • Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [[email protected]] I wrote a spamfilter in Perl Bruce Campbell
• 08 October 2003
  • Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [[email protected]] I wrote a spam filter in Perl Markus Stumpf
  • Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [[email protected]] I wrote a spamfilter in Perl Paul Wouters
  • Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [[email protected]] I wrote a spam filter in Perl pna.lists
  • Re: [[email protected]] I wrote a spam filter in Perl Walter Ian Kaye
• 23 September 2003
  • Re: [[email protected]] Anti-spam WG draft minutes RIPE 46 Markus Stumpf
• 22 September 2003
  • [[email protected]] European Commission workshops (not just UBE) Rodney Tillotson
• 17 September 2003
  • Re: [[email protected]] Spam form unassigned IP address??? furio ercolessi