This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[diversity] Community Plenary Presentation
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] Community Plenary Presentation
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] Community Plenary Presentation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Amanda Gowland
agowland at ripe.net
Thu Oct 17 15:36:46 CEST 2019
When the TF asked for clarity on the remit of the Trusted Contacts, we were informed on the list that: "Yes, I would argue that there are examples where the trusted contacts together with the RIPE chair have taken actions successfully. Maybe we weren't so good at reporting back to the community (which of course would help with the perception part)." and "As Trusted Contacts, our primary responsibility is confidentiality of the report to us. Our training was as a "vertrouwenspersoon," although fortunately for me that was the only part of the training that took place in Dutch. This makes the production of reports somewhat difficult as above all we do not want those who have reported an issue to us to feel they could be identified through that report -- or that in future they do not report an issue for fear of being identified (the simple act of writing down the report is even something to consider). We do report back to Hans Petter, and we are currently working on a report but with the figures quite abstracted as a result. If others that have been involved in similar work elsewhere have examples of the level of public report we could be producing, they would be welcome. So far, my suggestion is that it is no more detailed than something along the lines of the following categories: - "In-meeting behaviour"; - "Behaviour at social events"; - "Mailing list behaviour" The number of reports we do receive is, as that report will show, quite low. " On 17/10/2019 15:33, Sasha Romijn wrote: > I am definitely confused, because the text as written in the notes is > precisely how I heard it multiple times from at least one of the other > trusted contacts. > > Sasha > > On 17 Oct 2019, at 15:29, Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie > <mailto:brian.nisbet at heanet.ie>> wrote: > >> Mirjam, >> >> Ok, so, then there is confusion, and, if you could help, what can >> they do? >> >> I can edit and re-upload. >> >> Brian >> >> Brian Nisbet, >> Service Operations Manager, HEAnet >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From:* Mirjam Kuehne <mir at ripe.net <mailto:mir at ripe.net>> >> *Sent:* Thursday, October 17, 2019 3:22:58 PM >> *To:* Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie >> <mailto:brian.nisbet at heanet.ie>>; diversity at ripe.net >> <mailto:diversity at ripe.net> <diversity at ripe.net >> <mailto:diversity at ripe.net>> >> *Subject:* Re: [diversity] Community Plenary Presentation >> >> Hi, >> >> On slides 5 in the speaker notes (which I assume will be published?) it >> says: >> >> ""Trusted contacts will emotionally support you, but absolutely can not >> take any other action. Effectively, our CoC creates a false sense of >> security. So our community’s current status is: if you get severely >> harassed at the party, which is a thing that happens, we can say how >> sorry we are for you, and tomorrow and next year your assailant will be >> sitting next to you. There is a CoC, but there is no accountability or >> consequences.”" >> >> This is not true and as I pointed out earlier on this list the Trusted >> contacts (and the RIPE Chair) have taken action in the past. I agree >> that the responsibilities of the Trusted Contacts may not be well >> understood or documented, but stating it like in the text above is wrong. >> >> Mirjam >> >> >> On 17/10/2019 14:58, Brian Nisbet wrote: >> > Folks, >> > >> > Amanda, Denesh, Sasha and I have put this presentation together for >> the community plenary this afternoon. It is forthright, but we >> definitely feel that it needs to be so. >> > >> > We are going to make it clear that we're still accepting comments >> on v3.0, but also still looking at having this in place for RIPE 80 >> if at all possible. >> > >> > I know I and others present in Rotterdam have got some really good >> further feedback. >> > >> > And, of course, as with all things, whatever CoC we have is never >> set in stone, it's always changeable as situations change. >> > >> > Thanks for everyone's input on this so far! >> > >> > Brian >> > >> > Brian Nisbet >> > Service Operations Manager >> > HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research Network >> > 1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin D01 X8N7, Ireland >> > +35316609040 brian.nisbet at heanet.ie <mailto:brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> >> www.heanet.ie <http://www.heanet.ie> >> > Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270 >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > diversity mailing list >> > diversity at ripe.net <mailto:diversity at ripe.net> >> > https://mailman.ripe.net/ >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> diversity mailing list >> diversity at ripe.net <mailto:diversity at ripe.net> >> https://mailman.ripe.net/ > > > _______________________________________________ > diversity mailing list > diversity at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/diversity/attachments/20191017/d32ea06e/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] Community Plenary Presentation
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] Community Plenary Presentation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]