| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Legitimate business will be uneffect by the system as they will have special access.How would Big Brother differentiate legitimate from fly by night?
What exactly do you mean by close monitoring of mailing lists? Do you mean that you'll have dedicated staff for reading every obscure mailing list on the planet? And if a billion people want to send a mass mailing, does that mean all billion people must register with Big Brother?Mark's response:*> Close monitoring will be kept on all mailing lists at all times. *ROTFL* You don't have any idea on the number of mailing lists out there, do you? Exactly WHO will monitor them and WHO will decide?
The 'GIEIS' system will require a dedicated staff of possibly up to 500 people. Combine this with user reports and filters that parse messages looking for suspicious subjects/text and its going to be pretty secure. If we would be saving the industry almost $12 Billion a year, then there would be ample budget from that to run an EXTREMELY large dedicated centre.
90% positive response? You haven't even gotten that here; more like the reverse. Perhaps you were just very vague in your "contact" so the ISP representatives did not fully grasp the implications and only responded in a "wishful" sense; and as someone who has allegedly done scientific research, you must surely know that that would completely invalidate your test results.> Yesterday, in excess of 500 ISPs were contacted and informed about the > system. The response has been unbelievable to say the least with 90% > reporting immediatly that they would adopt such a system. Sorry, but I am sure this is a lie and I will stick to that until proved otherwise.Mark's response: What? Is it so difficult to email 500 companies??? Really!
| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |