[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse

Ron has presented several issues as he sees them. It is now up to ripe ncc to see what action if any to take on this cidr based on, say, inaccurate information presented in the paperwork.

Meanwhile could this little fight please go back to the schoolyard?

--srs

> On 17-Aug-2016, at 6:52 AM, Sascha Luck [ml] <aawg at c4inet.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 06:07:13PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> It is with a combination of humility and amazement that I take
>> note of Mr. Luck's personal interest in, and defense of the
>> honor and reputation of as yet unidentified Russian
>> cybercriminals. 
> 
> Again, with the unsubstantiated accusations. Based on missing
> apartment numbers, no less. Perhaps you subscribe to Mr Goebbels' axiom that, if you repeat a
> lie often enough, it becomes the truth?
> 
>> This exhibit of selfless compassion and
>> commitment to the rights of total strangers puts even the likes
>> of Mother Teresa and Pope Francis to shame.
> 
> Like most fanatics, you fail utterly at humour.
> 
>> I do wonder however if The Chair should not perhaps lighten Mr.
>> Luck's heavy burden by directly inviting the purported
>> registrants of the 82.221.130.64/26 IP address block to come
>> here, speak for themselves, and defend their own honor and
>> reputations, as they are themselves uniquely qualified to do.
> 
> You fail at secondary-school law too. They (whoever they may be)
> have to prove *nothing*. It is up to you to prove your
> accusations or shut the fuck up. 
> Yes, I'm aware this is ad-hominem but I am sick, sick to my back
> teeth, of your insane, endless trolling on this list. You, sir,
> need to seek professional help, the sooner the better.
> 
> EOC,
> 
> Sascha Luck
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Regards, rfg
>> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20160817/eb1487af/attachment.html>