<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><div style="direction: inherit;">Ron has presented several issues as he sees them. It is now up to ripe ncc to see what action if any to take on this cidr based on, say, inaccurate information presented in the paperwork.</div><div style="direction: inherit;"> </div><div style="direction: inherit;">Meanwhile could this little fight please go back to the schoolyard?</div> --srs</div><div> On 17-Aug-2016, at 6:52 AM, Sascha Luck [ml] <<a href="mailto:aawg@c4inet.net">aawg@c4inet.net</a>> wrote: </div><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 06:07:13PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: <blockquote type="cite">It is with a combination of humility and amazement that I take </blockquote><blockquote type="cite">note of Mr. Luck's personal interest in, and defense of the </blockquote><blockquote type="cite">honor and reputation of as yet unidentified Russian </blockquote><blockquote type="cite">cybercriminals. </blockquote> Again, with the unsubstantiated accusations. Based on missing apartment numbers, no less. Perhaps you subscribe to Mr Goebbels' axiom that, if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth? <blockquote type="cite">This exhibit of selfless compassion and </blockquote><blockquote type="cite">commitment to the rights of total strangers puts even the likes </blockquote><blockquote type="cite">of Mother Teresa and Pope Francis to shame. </blockquote> Like most fanatics, you fail utterly at humour. <blockquote type="cite">I do wonder however if The Chair should not perhaps lighten Mr. </blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Luck's heavy burden by directly inviting the purported </blockquote><blockquote type="cite">registrants of the 82.221.130.64/26 IP address block to come </blockquote><blockquote type="cite">here, speak for themselves, and defend their own honor and </blockquote><blockquote type="cite">reputations, as they are themselves uniquely qualified to do. </blockquote> You fail at secondary-school law too. They (whoever they may be) have to prove *nothing*. It is up to you to prove your accusations or shut the fuck up. Yes, I'm aware this is ad-hominem but I am sick, sick to my back teeth, of your insane, endless trolling on this list. You, sir, need to seek professional help, the sooner the better. EOC, Sascha Luck <blockquote type="cite"> </blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> </blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Regards, rfg </blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> </blockquote> </div></blockquote></body></html>