[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 06:07:13PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>It is with a combination of humility and amazement that I take
>note of Mr. Luck's personal interest in, and defense of the
>honor and reputation of as yet unidentified Russian
>cybercriminals. 

Again, with the unsubstantiated accusations. Based on missing
apartment numbers, no less. 
Perhaps you subscribe to Mr Goebbels' axiom that, if you repeat a
lie often enough, it becomes the truth?

> This exhibit of selfless compassion and
>commitment to the rights of total strangers puts even the likes
>of Mother Teresa and Pope Francis to shame.

Like most fanatics, you fail utterly at humour.

>I do wonder however if The Chair should not perhaps lighten Mr.
>Luck's heavy burden by directly inviting the purported
>registrants of the 82.221.130.64/26 IP address block to come
>here, speak for themselves, and defend their own honor and
>reputations, as they are themselves uniquely qualified to do.

You fail at secondary-school law too. They (whoever they may be)
have to prove *nothing*. It is up to you to prove your
accusations or shut the fuck up. 

Yes, I'm aware this is ad-hominem but I am sick, sick to my back
teeth, of your insane, endless trolling on this list. You, sir,
need to seek professional help, the sooner the better.

EOC,

Sascha Luck

>
>
>Regards, rfg
>