Archived Policy Proposals
The policy proposals on this page have been archived. You can see at a glance if they were accepted and adopted by the RIPE community or withdrawn at any stage.
- State:
- Accepted
- Archived Date:
- February 2013
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
- State:
- Accepted
- Archived Date:
- September 2012
- Working Group:
- Anti-Abuse Working Group
Summary: This proposal intends to increase the transparency of the transfer market for IPv4 addresses. It modifies the current intra-RIR IPv4 allocation transfer policy in order to require the RIPE NCC to publish a record of all transfers conducted under the policy.
- Archived Date:
- May 2012
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
Summary: This proposal modifies the eligibility for an organisation to receive an initial IPv6 allocation up to a /29. This is in order to enable small LIRs to deploy IPv6 using “IPv6 Rapid Deployment”, also known as “6rd”, as defined in RFC 5969 in a manner that does not encourage issuing a single /64 to end customers when an LIR has a minimum allocation of /32.
- State:
- Accepted
- Archived Date:
- May 2012
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
- State:
- Withdrawn
- Archived Date:
- May 2012
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
Summary: The goal of this proposal is to allow IPv4 address space transfers between the RIPE NCC and other RIRs in order to supplement the pool of available IPv4 addresses.
- State:
- Accepted
- Archived Date:
- January 2012
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
- State:
- Accepted
- Archived Date:
- October 2011
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
Summary: This proposal intends to define better how the address management of returned IPv4 address space will be performed when the final /8 policy comes into effect.
- State:
- Accepted
- Archived Date:
- October 2011
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
Summary: This proposal suggests to have the minimum assignment size for PI assignments to be a /24 when routing is a major issue for a multihoming End User.
- Archived Date:
- October 2011
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
The processes for how IPv4 space may be placed in the IANA Recovered IPv4 Pool is out of the scope of this proposal.
- State:
- Accepted
- Archived Date:
- August 2011
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group