This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Fri Dec 1 19:38:35 CET 2006
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 02:18:40PM +0100, Kurt Kayser wrote:
> But I might be really wrong in order to save a couple of 2-Byte AS-numbers,
> but somehow I have the feeling that 2-Byte space is out much faster that
> anticipated.
Given the number of (recognized) IXes, the number of 2-Byte AS numbers,
and the number of "lost" AS numbers, I'd say that focussing on IXes is
not going to gain very much - but possibly causing lots of confusion
and problems in troubleshooting.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 98999
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]