This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Kayser
kurt_kayser at gmx.de
Fri Dec 1 14:18:40 CET 2006
Hi Randy, Randy Bush wrote: >>Is inter-IXP-traffic really typical/necessary? > >>from a router on IX A, i want a nice clean traceroute to a router on IX > B, and only have access to that IX via my friend's network on IX A. If the router is not an IXP-owned router, each participating router is in a "normal" AS. But I might be really wrong in order to save a couple of 2-Byte AS-numbers, but somehow I have the feeling that 2-Byte space is out much faster that anticipated. So how far are we in globally reachable 4-Byte AS-numbers yet? (different topic). Regards, Kurt
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]