This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Geoff Huston
gih at apnic.net
Sun Dec 3 07:09:17 CET 2006
At 12:18 AM 2/12/2006, Kurt Kayser wrote: >Hi Randy, > >Randy Bush wrote: >>>Is inter-IXP-traffic really typical/necessary? >> >>>from a router on IX A, i want a nice clean traceroute to a router on IX >>B, and only have access to that IX via my friend's network on IX A. > >If the router is not an IXP-owned router, each participating router >is in a "normal" AS. > >But I might be really wrong in order to save a couple of 2-Byte AS-numbers, >but somehow I have the feeling that 2-Byte space is out much faster >that anticipated. Nope - the 2byte number consumption is pretty much right on schedule. >So how far are we in globally reachable 4-Byte AS-numbers yet? >(different topic). Ask your vendor about the state of their code! Geoff
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]