This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-list@ripe.net/
[ripe-list] RIPE Working Group Chair Collective Meeting Summary
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] consensus defintions
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE Working Group Chair Collective Meeting Summary
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Feb 9 14:29:46 CET 2021
> On 9 Feb 2021, at 11:33, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list <ripe-list at ripe.net> wrote: > > it may seem that ARIN and RIPE have more active participation, but if you look at it as % of membership, we are actually "worst" than other RIRs! RIPE != RIPE NCC. RIPE doesn’t have a membership. And it’s not an RIR. You’re right that participation levels are low but there is no practical way to improve that. If there was, it would have been done. We can’t force people to post to the lists or come to meetings or submit policy proposals. This is a much, much wider problem in society. Countries can’t even get enough of their citizens to vote in elections. > A few weeks ago, I was already considering to send a new policy proposal to make some other changes in the PDP. I will start working on that I think you need to pause for a few months and then think *very* carefully before proceeding Jordi. You also need to pay attention to the advice that you appear to have previously ignored: for instance the need for clear problem statements. You seem to think you have given a clear problem statement(s). Nobody else does.
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] consensus defintions
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE Working Group Chair Collective Meeting Summary
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]