This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-list@ripe.net/
[ripe-list] consensus defintions
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] consensus defintions
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE Working Group Chair Collective Meeting Summary
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Tue Feb 9 14:50:28 CET 2021
Hi Jim, I know very well RFC7282 and quoting a piece of it doesn't help. Only a complete read and understand of the document is useful. Otherwise, I can refute your quote with another quote from the same document, that shows that objections can still allow consensus: " If the chair of a working group determines that a technical issue brought forward by an objector has been truly considered by the working group, and the working group has made an informed decision that the objection has been answered or is not enough of a technical problem to prevent moving forward, the chair can declare that there is rough consensus to go forward, the objection notwithstanding." We can endless discuss about that, I don't think it will help. Regards, Jordi @jordipalet El 9/2/21 14:23, "ripe-list en nombre de Jim Reid" <ripe-list-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de jim at rfc1035.com> escribió: > On 9 Feb 2021, at 12:49, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list <ripe-list at ripe.net> wrote: > > Even if only me see those problems (which again is not the case, according to WGCC summary), still there is a chance that with the discussion of the proposal others support it and we can find a point where objections are invalid. This is what consensus mean. It does not mean that. You are wrong. Please read RFC7282. I quote: "Consensus is when everyone is sufficiently satisfied with the chosen solution, such that they no longer have specific objections to it.” Everyone is not sufficiently satisfied with your proposal(s) - QED - so by definition there cannot be a consensus for them. ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] consensus defintions
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE Working Group Chair Collective Meeting Summary
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]