This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-chair-discuss@ripe.net/
[ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Thu May 14 16:37:39 CEST 2020
> On 14 May 2020, at 15:15, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > > so we are where we are. i suspect no one in the nomcom process of ill > intent or lack of integrity. i believe the candidates are genuine and > hope we'll do our best to support the ones chosen. I fully agree. Let’s run the current agreed (and long under way!!) process to its conclusion. There will be plenty of time afterwards to conduct a post mortem, take account of the after-the-fact issues that are being raised now, apply lessons learned, etc so that the process is better for the next time. FWIW it will look awful if that process gets derailed now because of concerns that weren’t raised during the long community discussion as the appointment process was developed. Its sets a very ugly and dangerous precedent too.
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]