[ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process

> On 14 May 2020, at 15:15, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> 
>> Given that circumstances have changed. There is a chance of this being
>> funded by the NCC, it might be a full time role - would we perhaps
>> have had a wider set of candidates if that was part of the call for
>> nominations
> 
> if the dog had not stopped to pee, he would have caught the rabbit.
> 
> i think we all wish the circumstances are what they were when we last
> met.  unfortunately, no magic.
> 
> so we are where we are.  i suspect no one in the nomcom process of ill
> intent or lack of integrity.  i believe the candidates are genuine and
> hope we'll do our best to support the ones chosen.

I completely agree that the decision lies with the Nomcom and I have all respect for them. But they asked for feedback and then I would hope they would listen to it and make a decision based on the input. I am failing to understand what I sense is questioning of why we are providing input and even if we should provide input.

- kurtis -
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-chair-discuss/attachments/20200514/ecfb394c/attachment-0001.sig>