[ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 17.10.2012 23:31, Sascha Luck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:12:43AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
>> the LIR and the NCC may not be responsible for the abuse.  but
>> they are responsible for accurate and open publication of the
>> information about who is responsible for the PI range.
> 
> Yes. If some LIR does not do that, contact the NCC. That is its 
> function, it knows who sponsors the PI, and it has the powers to 
> "convince" a LIR to keep its information current. Spam from 
> self-appointed internet cops I can, as a LIR-contact, do without.
> 
> rgds, Sascha Luck

What I don't understand now: where is the need for the PI-owner to
stay more or less anonymous and the NCC over three edges to follow up
on that..
Just to keep a LIR's customers secret can't be the main argument - or
 again - is unfair - as if I remember policies right, as LIR with PA I
have to tell in DB my customer..

Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlB/JHwACgkQaWRHV2kMuAJ3LQCgl0gR3viab9vzkGhA/3eUkhlR
4eYAoIcX7PirTsH5hO3k8oMkuU9WIlt0
=jiBQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----