[ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:34:52PM +0200, Michael Markstaller wrote:
>What I don't understand now: where is the need for the PI-owner to
>stay more or less anonymous and the NCC over three edges to follow up
>on that..

Nonono, the PI "owner" is never anonymous, they must be registered in
the db, there has to be a contract and the NCC makes sure the user
exists (the LIR can't even do that themselves!)

>Just to keep a LIR's customers secret can't be the main argument - or
> again - is unfair - as if I remember policies right, as LIR with PA I
>have to tell in DB my customer..

Well, IMO that deserves some review as well from a privacy POV but is
not part of this proposal. 
However, PA space is different as that is "owned" by the LIR and merely
assigned to the end-user. That makes the LIR responsible for the actions
of the assignee (via AUP etc).

rgds,
Sascha