This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Wed Oct 17 23:31:26 CEST 2012
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:12:43AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote: >the LIR and the NCC may not be responsible for the abuse. but they are >responsible for accurate and open publication of the information about >who is responsible for the PI range. Yes. If some LIR does not do that, contact the NCC. That is its function, it knows who sponsors the PI, and it has the powers to "convince" a LIR to keep its information current. Spam from self-appointed internet cops I can, as a LIR-contact, do without. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]