This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rob Evans
rhe at nosc.ja.net
Thu May 16 12:51:32 CEST 2024
Just to reiterate this: > They did, actually. All the old LIRs created policies to ensure that > new LIRs could still get some IPv4, instead of using it all up themselves. There are numerous discussions in the address policy archives where IPv4 allocations were gradually made more restrictive to slow down the burn rate, whilst others advocated running out as quickly as possible in an attempt to force the deployment of, and transition to, IPv6. Cheers, Rob
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]