[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members

Rob,

believe me, those who burnet IPv4 space like Gert will never transition to
IPv6, we have an example Gert for that in which he has for 25 years
alerting members to implement IPv6 but he/his company has for 25 years
implemented 1.6% of IPv6! Btw my new moto is from now on:

-- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? Because i will never do,
but you should do it :)

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:54 PM Rob Evans <rhe at nosc.ja.net> wrote:

> Just to reiterate this:
>
> > They did, actually.  All the old LIRs created policies to ensure that
> > new LIRs could still get some IPv4, instead of using it all up
> themselves.
>
> There are numerous discussions in the address policy archives where IPv4
> allocations were gradually made more restrictive to slow down the burn
> rate, whilst others advocated running out as quickly as possible in an
> attempt to force the deployment of, and transition to, IPv6.
>
> Cheers,
> Rob
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albahost.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240516/d3302d8d/attachment.html>