This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sebastien Brossier
sebastien at brossier.org
Mon Apr 15 10:42:57 CEST 2024
On 15/04/2024 09:22, Michel Lanners wrote: > Because RIPE is a MEMBERSHIP organisation. It’s not a commercial company > selling something. > > If I’m asked to pay more I also want more voting rights. Consequence: > the few big ones will dominate and steer RIPE in the direction THEY > want. I don’t think that’s in the interest of those who yell at the > unfair membership rate. > > RIPE is fair because every member has the same right and the same one vote. No, you're not getting more voting rights by paying more. It is common practice in membership orgs to charge members according to their category or size, and it's still 1 member = 1 vote. Sebastien Brossier
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]