This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matias Meier
m.meier at xelon.ch
Wed Apr 10 15:12:27 CEST 2024
Hello together I agree on this, there has to be an option D “No change to rates, RIPE reduces budget” in my opinion, otherwise the proposal should be rejected. Best regards Matias Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> Im Auftrag von Daniel Pearson Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. April 2024 14:58 An: members-discuss at ripe.net Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals Hi Fergal, Thank you for that clarification. As-such I think this entire proposal needs to be rejected and sent back to the board until a fourth option of no-change is added. Daniel~ On 4/10/24 7:54 AM, Fergal Cunningham wrote: Dear Rob, The vote for this proposal would not allow all options to be rejected. It would be run with the instant run-off vote format in the same way as the Executive Board election is run. So members would be asked to vote for the three options in order of preference and the scheme that achieves more than 50% of preferences either on the first round or second round would be deemed to have been chosen. Hope that helps. Fergal On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2:46 PM Rob Evans <rhe at nosc.ja.net<mailto:rhe at nosc.ja.net>> wrote: Hi, > Why do we not have an option that refuses any rate increases, and forces RIPE to reduce it's budget? > > Option D - No change to rates, RIPE reduces budget according to fewer number of LIR! I believe that is implicit if options A, B and C are all voted down. Rob _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss at ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss at ripe.net> https://mailman.ripe.net/ Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40ripe.net _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss at ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss at ripe.net> https://mailman.ripe.net/ Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesystems.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240410/90dd42aa/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]