This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrick Velder
lists at velder.li
Wed Apr 10 17:30:35 CEST 2024
+1 On 4/10/24 15:12, Matias Meier via members-discuss wrote: > > Hello together > > I agree on this, there has to be an option D “No change to rates, RIPE > reduces budget” in my opinion, otherwise the proposal should be rejected. > > Best regards > > Matias > > *Von:*members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> *Im Auftrag > von *Daniel Pearson > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 10. April 2024 14:58 > *An:* members-discuss at ripe.net > *Betreff:* Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] > [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals > > Hi Fergal, > > > Thank you for that clarification. > > > As-such I think this entire proposal needs to be rejected and sent > back to the board until a fourth option of no-change is added. > > Daniel~ > > On 4/10/24 7:54 AM, Fergal Cunningham wrote: > > Dear Rob, > > The vote for this proposal would not allow all options to be > rejected. It would be run with the instant run-off vote format in > the same way as the Executive Board election is run. So members > would be asked to vote for the three options in order of > preference and the scheme that achieves more than 50% of > preferences either on the first round or second round would be > deemed to have been chosen. > > Hope that helps. Fergal > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2:46 PM Rob Evans <rhe at nosc.ja.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Why do we not have an option that refuses any rate > increases, and forces RIPE to reduce it's budget? > > > > Option D - No change to rates, RIPE reduces budget according > to fewer number of LIR! > > I believe that is implicit if options A, B and C are all voted > down. > > Rob > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40ripe.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > > members-discuss mailing list > > members-discuss at ripe.net > > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > > Unsubscribe:https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesystems.net > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe:https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/lists%40velder.li -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240410/400286fe/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]