[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals

Hi Fergal,

Thank you for that clarification.

As-such I think this entire proposal needs to be rejected and sent back 
to the board until a fourth option of no-change is added.

Daniel~

On 4/10/24 7:54 AM, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
>
> Dear Rob,
>
> The vote for this proposal would not allow all options to be rejected. 
> It would be run with the instant run-off vote format in the same way 
> as the Executive Board election is run. So members would be asked to 
> vote for the three options in order of preference and the scheme that 
> achieves more than 50% of preferences either on the first round or 
> second round would be deemed to have been chosen.
>
> Hope that helps. Fergal
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2:46 PM Rob Evans <rhe at nosc.ja.net> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     > Why do we not have an option that refuses any rate increases,
>     and forces RIPE to reduce it's budget?
>     >
>     > Option D - No change to rates, RIPE reduces budget according to
>     fewer number of LIR!
>
>     I believe that is implicit if options A, B and C are all voted down.
>
>     Rob
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     members-discuss mailing list
>     members-discuss at ripe.net
>     https://mailman.ripe.net/
>     Unsubscribe:
>     https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40ripe.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> Unsubscribe:https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesystems.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240410/141eded1/attachment.html>