[members-discuss] Your opinion about Temporary Assignment request

Hi Gert,

Thank you for your reply.

It isn't a secret, we're facing with a problem to get the resources for 
the testing (not for the customers).

On 10/25/21 9:29 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 09:18:35AM +0300, Sergei Volgapkin wrote:
>> May you find the time to tell your opinion about situation with
>> "Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies"
>> (https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-587).
>>
>> We've found that RIPE Team can reply you in this manner "/at this moment
>> we have not received //*sufficient evidence*//in order to see that the
>> request for a temporary assignment is justified/"/./
>> If you ask about examples of "sufficient evidence" you may get the
>> answer like this "/I am afraid that we are not able to give any
>> examples. Temporary assignments are provided on a case-by-case basis and
>> there is not a 'standard template' for this./"
>>
>> It means that RIPE able selectively accept requests for the temporary
>> assignments and not every LIR has the same capabilities.
>>
>> I think that this service should have just standard request form. I'm
>> appreciate for your time and answers.
> This sounds more like a question for the address policy working group.
>
> And yes, of course this is evaluated on a case-by-case basis, as
> https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-587 is deliberately not
> including a positive list, because that would limit its use for new
> things that haven't been tried before.
>
>
> *So, out of curiosity, what purpose were you requesting address for 
> that got denied? "Assignment to customers", for example, is something 
> the NCC would be correctly refusing.*
>
> Gert Doering
>          -- NetMaster

-- 
Sergei

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20211025/cb4c9686/attachment.html>