[members-discuss] Your opinion about Temporary Assignment request

Hi Sergei,

Most of the use cases for Temp assignments are for research or events as far as I know..

Most test setup’s are probably expected to be done internally ..

Without knowing the size of the test or the situation,  this is how I would view it.
If you want to discuss this more in detail, it is probably best to do so in address policy. ( address-policy-wg at ripe.net<mailto:address-policy-wg at ripe.net> ) Or in private.

Regards,
Erik Bais

From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Sergei Volgapkin <sv at unitynet.ru>
Date: Monday 25 October 2021 at 13:14
To: Gert Doering <gert at space.net>
Cc: "members-discuss at ripe.net" <members-discuss at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Your opinion about Temporary Assignment request


Hi Gert,

Thank you for your reply.

It isn't a secret, we're facing with a problem to get the resources for the testing (not for the customers).
On 10/25/21 9:29 AM, Gert Doering wrote:

Hi,



On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 09:18:35AM +0300, Sergei Volgapkin wrote:

May you find the time to tell your opinion about situation with

"Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies"

(https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-587).



We've found that RIPE Team can reply you in this manner "/at this moment

we have not received //*sufficient evidence*//in order to see that the

request for a temporary assignment is justified/"/./

If you ask about examples of "sufficient evidence" you may get the

answer like this "/I am afraid that we are not able to give any

examples. Temporary assignments are provided on a case-by-case basis and

there is not a 'standard template' for this./"



It means that RIPE able selectively accept requests for the temporary

assignments and not every LIR has the same capabilities.



I think that this service should have just standard request form. I'm

appreciate for your time and answers.

This sounds more like a question for the address policy working group.



And yes, of course this is evaluated on a case-by-case basis, as

https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-587 is deliberately not

including a positive list, because that would limit its use for new

things that haven't been tried before.





So, out of curiosity, what purpose were you requesting address for that

got denied?  "Assignment to customers", for example, is something the

NCC would be correctly refusing.



Gert Doering

        -- NetMaster

--

Sergei
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20211027/c3af07cc/attachment.html>