This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ivaylo
ivaylo at bglans.net
Thu Jan 17 13:47:11 CET 2019
Hello, Marian I think TrustHost just gave an example. If there are charging scheme based on resources the LIR needs, the fees will be different. For example if we took all incomes from membership for 2018 and all nets allocated for RIPE region... (SUM amount of money for 2018 collected from membership anual fees) / (All /22 nets allocated for RIPE region) = fee for one /22 So the fee for 10 x /22 will be much less than 14000 EURO per year as it is now if you have 10 opened LIRs. Also if RIPE managing freed resources, dedicating new such ro your bussiness needs will be much faster I beleave. Ivaylo Josifov Varteh LTD Varna Bulgaria On Thu, 17 Jan 2019, Marian Marinov wrote: > On 1/16/19 2:16 PM, TrustHost wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I think it would be great if the payment depends on the quantity the resources for one account. It would help to return unused IPv4 in free pool for new business. The companies, who really use big networks won't notice such changes. But who received >> the resources before 2012 and has unused /19 and maybe more will think if they really need such big blocks. >> >> For example we can implement the next charging scheme. >> If one account has more than /20 (not equivalent 4x/22 or the blocks were allocated before 2012) the next /22 ownership will cost some price (e.g. 1400 euro). >> >> For example: >> There is /17 IPv4 block for one LIR account. >> /17 = 32x/22. >> The total price for this account is (32-4)*1400 = 39 200 euro. >> >> I think the members must have equal rights, regardless of the year of the membership started. >> > > I do not agree. As a company that has to keep at least 10 /22 available at all times, this means that I would be paying more, just because I need to make sure the company can grow fast enough, when it needs to. > > Buying and transferring IPs takes weeks with all the paperwork, so the only way we can keep growing is by keeping IPs in reserve. And we and our clients would need to pay for that. > > > > -- > Marian Marinov > Founder & CEO of 1H Ltd. > Jabber/GTalk: hackman at jabber.org > ICQ: 7556201 > IRC: hackman @ irc.freenode.net > Mobile: +359 886 660 270 > >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]