This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Denis Fondras
ripe at liopen.fr
Thu Jan 17 14:01:14 CET 2019
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:59:52PM +0100, Marian Marinov wrote: > I do not agree. As a company that has to keep at least 10 /22 available at all > times, this means that I would be paying more, just because I need to make > sure the company can grow fast enough, when it needs to. > Buying and transferring IPs takes weeks with all the paperwork, so the only > way we can keep growing is by keeping IPs in reserve. And we and our clients > would need to pay for that. > Sitting on a good amount of IPv4 has value for you but you and your customers do not agree to pay for it ?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]