[members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Denis Fondras
ripe at liopen.fr
Thu Jan 17 14:01:14 CET 2019
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:59:52PM +0100, Marian Marinov wrote: > I do not agree. As a company that has to keep at least 10 /22 available at all > times, this means that I would be paying more, just because I need to make > sure the company can grow fast enough, when it needs to. > Buying and transferring IPs takes weeks with all the paperwork, so the only > way we can keep growing is by keeping IPs in reserve. And we and our clients > would need to pay for that. > Sitting on a good amount of IPv4 has value for you but you and your customers do not agree to pay for it ?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]